COUNCILLORS have passed a resolution designed to help protect green space in urban areas following a big turn out of people objecting to a plan for 54 “affordable” homes.
Members of Stockton Heath Parish Council approved a resolution that the council “presumed” that urban green space would not be developed.
It was the only way the council could indicate their views on a plan for housing association homes on land adjoining Montclare Crescent and Ackers Road, known locally as Cartwright’s Field, in the absence of a formal planning application.
But they agreed to hold a special meeting next month by which time it is expected an application will have been submitted.
More than 80 people attended the monthly meeting of the council to oppose the scheme.
It was standing room only and
some people had to listen from corridors outside.
Some children were in tears as they spoke in defence of the field where they play.
Resident Phil McConnell, founder of an action group formed to oppose the development said neighbours were “unanimous” in wanting to retain the space.
He said there was a lack of amenities in the area and extra housing would put a strain on services such as doctors, dentists and schools.
There could also be about 200 vehicle journeys on and off the site putting significant pressure on busy Chester Road, Brian Avenue, Denbury Avenue and the Cantilever Bridge.
Although the borough council claimed there was a need for “affordable housing” residents felt this was not the case in Stockton Heath.
Mr McConnell was concerned that people would be moved from other parts of the borough to Stockton Heath, changing the “dynamics” of the community. People may not want to move from the other side of the town to Stockton Heath, just to get on the housing ladder.
The mother of a10-years old boy from Montclare Crescent said her son would be “devastated” to loose the play area. Parents felt their children were safe on the field.
One boy from Denbury Avenue said he and friends like to play in the street outside their homes. He was worried this may not be possible with the extra traffic.
Parents were also concerned that if the site was lost children might play in “dangerous areas” such as the banks of the Bridgewater Canal and Ackers Pit. Others were concerned about loss of wildlife.
