PLANNING bosses at Warrington have put off a decision on a controversial proposal to convert a pair of 19th century barns into five dwellings.
Members of the borough council’s planning committee want to carry out a site inspection before they make up their minds.
The scheme also involves the demolition of Hollingreave Farm, in Dam Lane, Rixton, to make way for a new two-storey house.
It is being opposed by neighbours and by Rixton-with-Glazebrook Parish Council.
They claim the Green Belt site is not large enough to accommodate five additional dwellings – and that the old barns are not worth preserving.
But planning officers are recommending the scheme be approved and say the parish council’s view that the buildings are not worth retention is “subjective”.
They believe the barns are inherently attractive and the conversion proposals will enhance them.
North Cheshire Developments Ltd want to demolish the existing farmhouse and replace it with a modern, two-storey detached house.
The two 19th century barns would be converted to five one-and-a-half and two-storey dwellings – one which would be “affordable.”
In addition, four of five 20th century agricultural buildings would be removed – as well as a double garage block.
Landscaping proposals include the creation of a native wildflower meadow, with existing hedging retained and enhanced.
Three years ago, planners refused permission for the conversion of three barns to offices after objections from neighbours that the development would amount to a “mini-industrial estate” in the Green Belt.
PLANNING bosses at Warrington have put off a decision on a controversial
proposal to convert a pair of 19th century barns into five dwellings.
Barns plan put on hold
11 Comments
Share.
1 Comment
Why do they meet to discuss things and then put them on hold pending a site visit and then have to meet again to discuss the very same thing ? Surely it would make sense with applications like this (ie green belt or where many objections have been received) to just do a site visit prior to the meeting so as to not waste time, effort and/or duplication of ‘chat’. I didn’t expect them to pass this one straight off anyway as they’ve just refused similar. It’s odd but I’ve started to notice a bit of a pattern when you look at some applications. Anyone read the full planning application by the way, its very indepth adn also interesting as the site/farm is apparently vacant and in a state of disrepair NOW 😉