MP speaks up for crime victims

2

WARRINGTON North MP Helen Jones has attacked Government proposals to slash spending on the Criminal Injuries Compensation scheme.
She claims the proposed cuts will hit more than 90 per of seriously injured victims of violent crime and the dependants of murder victims.
The MP (pictured) voted against the proposals in the House of Commons.
The scheme currently supports more than 30,000 injured victims each year with relatively small payments which help to make up for lost pay while they are unable to work due to their injuries.
The Government’s proposed cuts would mean that compensation would not be available to victims who sustain injuries such as facial disfigurement, permanent speech impediment or multiple fractured ribs, Ms Jones says.
The victims of dog attacks would no longer receive any compensation, no matter how serious their injuries.
Even the most seriously injured victims of crime would have their payments slashed, as compensation for loss of earnings would be limited to the rate of statutory sick pay – just £85 a week.
Any victim who had a period out of work in the previous three years – around a third of the UK workforce – would not receive any compensation for loss of earnings.
The same cuts and conditions would apply to the dependants of murder victims, drastically reducing their compensation and financial security following the death of a loved one.
After the Commons debate Ms Jones said: “The Government have sought to make these huge cuts to compensation for 90 per cent of injured victims of crime by the back door, with no discussion by the full House of Commons.
“Labour MPs called this debate as a final opportunity for MPs to demonstrate to Government Ministers the fundamental flaws in their program of cuts to Criminal Injuries Compensation.
“It was also a chance for MPs to stand up for the victims of crime and demonstrate to the Government that there must be a better way to make cuts than to 90 per cent of seriously injured victims of violent crime and to the dependants of murder victims.
“I promise that I will continue to put the interests of victims first, but I am deeply disappointed that Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs chose to ignore the plight facing so many seriously injured victims of crime, and failed to vote against these cruel and unnecessary cuts.”
The shopworkers’ union Usdaw have been campaigning against the cuts in compensation on behalf of many of their members who fall victim to violent robberies.
Usdaw General Secretary John Hannett said: “Thousands of shopworkers and other innocent victims of violent criminals desperately need the relatively small amounts that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme provides. Most who suffer serious injuries need to take considerable time off work to recover.
“We believe that seriously injured victims of violent crime have suffered enough and should not have to face possible deprivation and debt as well. The Government seem to want victims of crime to suffer financially as well as physically.”


2 Comments
Share.

About Author

Experienced journalist for more than 40 years. Managing Director of magazine publishing group with three in-house titles and on-line daily newspaper for Warrington. Experienced writer, photographer, PR consultant and media expert having written for local, regional and national newspapers. Specialties: PR, media, social networking, photographer, networking, advertising, sales, media crisis management. Chair of Warrington Healthwatch Director Warrington Chamber of Commerce Patron Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace. Trustee Warrington Disability Partnership. Former Chairman of Warrington Town FC.

2 Comments

  1. Should it be only violent crime or should those who, for example , have had their email accounts hacked into by journalists, politicians etc. be compensated?

Leave A Comment