Union slams council's savage cuts

4

UNION bosses at Warrington have accused the borough council of failing to consider the human impact of “savage cuts.”
Elected members and the senior management team are only interested in balancing the books, says UNISON.
The union also expresses disappointed that the council has not accepted a challenge for councillors or senior officers to “go undercover” to learn the value of their workforce.
Joint branch secretary Jason Horan said the council was continuing to employ costly consultants and agency workers despite being “caught out” spending £28 million in this way.
He said: “Before they continue with the culling of jobs, perhaps elected members and the senior managers should take a reality check and dispose of the costly consultants and temporary agency staff that cost the council huge amounts of tax payers money.”
As reported by warrington-worldwide last month, UNISON issued a challenge to councillors and senior officers to go undercover to observe the work carried out by frontline staff and learn something about the impact job cuts would have on services and employees.
Mr Horan said: “It is no surprise to UNISON that we received very little response. In fact, out of 57 councillors we received two responses, both of which stated that they couldn’t afford the time to go undercover and see for themselves the valuable services that council employees provide.”
They also received a response from chief executive Diana Terris, (pictured right) who said that while the idea had met with a measure of agreement, it would be difficult for senior decision makers to maintain anonymity.
“She then went on to say she wishes to spend more time seeing front line services and that consideration is being given as to what might be possible. “UNISON waits with baited breath for how this will be undertaken but don’t hold out much hope.
“If our challenge had been met with a degree of seriousness then a way to maintain anonymity would be found.
“Elected members and the senior management team are only interested in balancing the books, Perhaps they should be considering the human impact of the savage cuts and how their decisions are going to impact on the welfare of their employees?
“Before they continue with the culling of jobs, perhaps elected members and the senior managers should take a reality check and dispose of the costly consultants and temporary agency staff that cost Warrington Borough Council huge amounts of tax payers money.”


4 Comments
Share.

About Author

Experienced journalist for more than 40 years. Managing Director of magazine publishing group with three in-house titles and on-line daily newspaper for Warrington. Experienced writer, photographer, PR consultant and media expert having written for local, regional and national newspapers. Specialties: PR, media, social networking, photographer, networking, advertising, sales, media crisis management. Chair of Warrington Healthwatch Director Warrington Chamber of Commerce Patron Tim Parry Johnathan Ball Foundation for Peace. Trustee Warrington Disability Partnership. Former Chairman of Warrington Town FC.

4 Comments

  1. “Elected members and the senior management team are only interested in balancing the books, says UNISON. ” Good. That means they are doing their job. If the previous Labour government had done their job half as well as Warrington council we would not be in this difficult situation in the first place.

  2. Blaming the previous Labour government for a global economic crisis shows somewhat muddled thinking!!! UNISON have a very good point, wasting money employing expensive consultants whilst making job cuts elsewhere is extremely bad management…….but this is just the latest in a long line of cock-ups by WBC. None of which they have had the dignity to take the blame for……..it’s always someone else’s fault isn’t it 8 ?

  3. Temporary agency staff may cost more per hour, but they’re one hell of a lot cheaper when it comes to absenteeism, redundancy and pensions! So, maybe the council should be applauded for it’s foresight in having developed such a flexible labour pool!

  4. If the council management from top to bottom paid themselves salaries of not more than an MP (ie £65,000) and did the job they get paid to do on their own; without hiring consultants to do their job for them (ie if they’re not up to doing the job themselves they shouldn’t be in there in the first place); then perhaps they wouldn’;t have to make all the job cuts (of people who can only dream of a salary of £65,000 per yr) Somehow I can’t see those kin d of cuts happening though.

Leave A Comment